The Personality and Geography of the Entrepreneur

The Entrepreneurial Personality Profile

Creating new jobs is one of the top priorities for all politicians these days. This issue always ends up being discussed in terms of taxes and spending, sometimes in terms of education, but never ever in terms of people. This is ultimately the old Enlightenment view that human behavior, good or bad, is all about arranging external factors. People are assumed to respond to whatever plans or reforms the political leaders come up with.

And yet, if we look at indicators relevant to job creation it becomes clear that people do what they don’t respond the way they’re supposed to. Take self-employment for example. It has been very stable around 10-15 percent for many years now, seemingly unaffected by shifting policies. Before that it was a bit higher due to more people working in agriculture. A reason for this can be found in entrepreneur research, which shows that certain personality traits make for a good entrepreneur – just like other traits make for a good police, a good nurse etc. These traits are fairly stable over time explaining the relatively constant percentage of entrepreneurs in the American population (and most likely other populations as well).

The psychological research on people with this profession suggests that, in terms of the Big Five model, the entrepreneur profile is high on Extraversion, Openness and Conscientiousness, and low on Agreeableness and Neuroticism. The reasons for this particular mix may seem obvious, except perhaps the low Agreeableness. This is probably because an entrepreneur must be tough and not back down in negotiations. A lot of people complain about how nerve-wrecking it is to negotiate how much you should be paid with your employer, but an entrepreneur has to make similar negotiations on a regular basis, so it makes sense that they need thicker skin than the rest of us.

A Rare Commodity

By all accounts, the traits that make up the entrepreneurial profile are highly inheritable and stable from early adulthood. This means that the number of entrepreneurs (or job creators) will be limited by the amount of people who have the profile and the strength of its relation to entrepreneurial activity. So when politicians say they will create new jobs they appear to indulge in a fantasy. More realistically, they can help entrepreneurs to create jobs. Like a secretary can help an architect or a doctor to do his job more efficient.

I don’t want to sound all Ayn Rand here; I understand that the world would be pretty unpleasant without polices and nurses (and very inefficient without secretaries). We shouldn’t worship these people like some libertarians do, but at the same time we have to accept that a lot of people can be nurses and polices but few can be entrepreneurs – and entrepreneurs are more important. While other research has shown how intelligence affects the economic development, on both an individual and national level, it may be that entrepreneurship is even more important. The intelligent person can maintain the order of things, but entrepreneur is the driving force in technological development. He or she is the reason you’re reading this on a computer (or similar device), why you have fresh food stored in your fridge and why you can travel to the other side of the planet in less than two days.

So while libertarianism may be little more than a personality disorder, Rand still has a point. These individuals have a profound effect on society and to understand the world around us we need to understand them better.

Drawing the Map

One important question regarding entrepreneurship is whether all countries and regions are equally blessed with this commodity or if it’s unevenly distributed. Obviously some countries are more entrepreneurial than others, but that may be for political reasons, because while you can’t create entrepreneurs, you can suppress them. There are probably people in North Korea who have ideas and want to start businesses too.

But if we look at the personality side of this issue, international comparisons suggest that personality traits are unevenly distributed, so if two culturally similar nations had the exact same policies implemented one would still be more innovative than the other for purely genetic reasons. These international studies have been criticized since they sometimes make little sense – Japan scoring lower than Nigeria on Conscientiousness, Italians being introverted and things like that. But even with these clear mistakes, the overall results from the biggest international study of this kind are validated by culture level measures.

But we might get a more reliable test of the importance of the entrepreneurial personality by looking within nations. As I mentioned in my previous post, the data compiled by psychologist Peter Jason Rentfrow, shows an uneven distribution of Big Five factors within the United States. This means that the average levels of some states will be more similar to the entrepreneurial profile than others. But does this also mean that average levels of traits characterizing an entrepreneur on the individual level will translate to more entrepreneurial activity on the regional level?

A case for this is made in a recent study by German psychologists Martin Obschonka and colleagues, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology earlier this year. They used Rentfrow’s data to create a measure of Entrepreneur-prone personality profile for the different states in America. This is what they came up with,

State-level map of the entrepreneur-prone personality

State-level map of the entrepreneur-prone personality, the darker the more entrepreneurial.

As you can see the East-West divide of Neuroticism I discussed in my previous post is present here too, although less pronounced since the other traits weigh in as well. But it’s clear that the distribution is uneven and clustered.

Obschonka then compared this ranking with measures of entrepreneurship, such as the Kauffman Index (measuring business startups) and self-employment rates. They found that even when controlling for state-level measures of prosperity, race, age and gender distribution, they got correlations around 0.35 between the personality profile and the Kauffman Index. Here is the map of entrepreneurial activity for comparison,

State-level map of entrepreneurial activity, the darker, the busier.

State-level map of entrepreneurial activity, the darker, the busier.

As expected from the correlations you can see a resemblance in that there is a cluster in the West. There are some states that break the pattern in a conspicuous way: Mississippi and Maine have the wrong profile but perform well while Nevada and Washington are the other way around. This may be due to the fact that both these measures used are fairly crude. As far as I can tell, The Kauffman Index counts all business startups – hotdog stands and high tech ventures alike. And the personality profile is built on the assumption that all traits are equally important which, if true, seems like a happy accident. (Rentfrow was kind enough to send me his data in an Excel file so when I have the time, I’ll be looking to see if a weighted measure could give a better picture of the entrepreneurial personality as well as comparing it to lots of other interesting variables).

Obschonka and his colleagues then went on the make regional-level studies of American Metropolitan areas, the UK and Germany. They got the same result with similar sized correlations but couldn’t reach statistical significance due to the small number of regions. So while preliminary, these findings suggest that their results hold not just for America but within other countries too, and most likely between countries as well.

Implications

This study is the first of its kind and the positive result no doubt means it will be followed by others. The results, should they hold up, can explain things like why people leave California for Utah or why Japan leveled out, and maybe why China isn’t the future either, but perhaps why Chile might be. It’s also interesting to note that entrepreneurial hotspots are not clearly linked to the large metropolitan areas, that are often hyped as being at the forefront of just about everything. Judging by both personality and activity it seems like states like Colorado and New Mexico show more promise than states containing larger cities, like California and New York. Then we have the fact that these clusters were most likely in part created by migrations and can be changed by future migrations.

It’s a whole new field of research opening up here – doesn’t even have a name yet but I’m sure it will soon enough – and it will be highly interesting to see what comes out of it in the future.

Advertisements

11 Responses to The Personality and Geography of the Entrepreneur

  1. JayMan says:

    Here in Maine, a lot of people still work as lobster fishermen, who are technically “self-employed”.

    There is a television program called Shark Tank that airs here in the U.S. that is all about entrepreneurs who seek investments from millionaire and billionaire venture capitalists – who themselves are self-made successes. Here’s a few clips:

    Dang, this is an example where the HEXACO scale would have come in handy. Business people are undoubtedly higher on the “dark triad” than average, especially Machiavellianism. Obviously the Sharks, seeing that they’re on TV, are likely higher on narcissism as well, and are probably somewhat psychopathic to boot (they frequently berate entrepreneurs who refuse to offshore production to China, for example).

    Indeed, owing to its sparse population, folks from the U.S. interior West seem to be overrepresented on the show, which meshes with your findings. Notice the sharp contrast between the interior and the West Coast. The settlers to the interior were definitely the more pioneering, self-made mindset (they had to be, considering the harshness of the environment). This type of independent streak may be part of the reason they simply don’t trust the gub’ment… 😉

    • Staffan says:

      Self-employment got much lower correlations even though they omitted the agricultural sector. I don’t if the counted fishermen. Startups is a better measure, and succesful startups even more so. But it’s the first study of its kind so maybe they are just trying to cover the basic factors.

      I’ve seen that show and that bald guy sure reeks of dark triad traits. I find him a bit scary.

      Yes, the HEXACO or just direct measures of dark traits would most likely give a better profile. A lot of researchers are leaving the big factor for narrower traits or facets to get more validity.

      It’s interesting about the interior West. We have an entrepreneurial region like that in Sweden too. It’s also a relatively harsh environment and folks there are more Christian than elsewhere.

      • JayMan says:

        “I’ve seen that show and that bald guy sure reeks of dark triad traits. I find him a bit scary.”

        Scary? Mr. Wonderful? Nah… 😉

        “It’s interesting about the interior West. We have an entrepreneurial region like that in Sweden too. It’s also a relatively harsh environment and folks there are more Christian than elsewhere.”

        That is pretty interesting. I wonder if that pattern holds in other countries as well? Does harsh living (but potentially promising living, if you can master it) select for the entrepreneurial type? Fascinating stuff.

  2. Reblogged this on eclecticelite and commented:
    Entrepreneurs are the bread & butter of society; however it’s not a destiny for everyone. Personality traits affect the success of us all, so it is wise to know what you excel at. Are you an entrepreneur??? I am.

    • Staffan says:

      They don’t get enough credit, They take all the risk – and lots fail and go bankrupt – while everyone benefits from them. I always thought governments should strike deals with budding entrepreneurs making the risk less for a part of the potential profits. We had a little of that here in Sweden but the agency just sponsored stupid stuff; I think that project has been terminated now.

  3. […] The Personality and Geography of the Entrepreneur – “German psychologists Martin Obschonka and colleagues…used Rentfrow’s [big five personality] data to create a measure of Entrepreneur-prone personality profile for the different states in America.” – another really cool post from staffan! […]

  4. Benjamin David Steele says:

    As an Iowan, I wonder why Iowa (and the Mississippi Delta states) measure low on entrepreneur-prone personality and yet high on entrepreneurial activity. That is perplexing. I never thought of Iowa as entrepreneurial exactly, although not anti-entrepreneurial either. It doesn’t have an extremely large or concentrated population and the population has remained almost entirely without growth for a century.

    • Staffan says:

      That may be due to other factors, like local policies, infrastructure etc. Maybe the ethanol boom is helping?

      • Benjamin David Steele says:

        There is a big wind energy industry in Iowa. Eastern Iowa also has I-80 which brings diverse influences, including Chicago. There could be many factors. It just seemed odd.

  5. […] resist the invaders). The Wild West was born of these people, where only the toughest survived. The traits of these early colonists are quite visible in the present population. The area is heavily Scotch-Irish in population, who […]

  6. […] Sorting has been key to the genesis of the Far West. The obligatorily pastoral living favored the Scots-Irish from Greater Appalachia to settle the region, and the distance, isolation, and harsh climate (and hostile Native Americans trying to resist the conquest of their territory) selected for an individualistic, tough-minded type of person. There was a reason the West was Wild. This has left a special mark of the personality of the area, as Staffan once discussed: […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: